Nook Performance Increases & Settings

It looks like we have quite a few different setups for various members at this point and I was wondering if anybody cared to share their modifications and corresponding performance. If we can get some numbers together in one thread it might help others decide which changes to make. It also might help direct performance refinements.

Ideally we would have something like this for various set ups:

Stock auto-nooter set up

Software: Android 2.1
B&N: 1.0.1
CPU: 300MHz, 600MHz, 800MHz
Quadrant Score: 948
Screen Time out: 2 mins
Brightness: Low
Wifi: always on
Battery Life: 8+hrs

Or screen shots of the information.

 

Stock auto-nooter set up
Software: Android 2.1
B&N: 1.0.1
CPU: 300MHz, 600MHz, 800MHz
Quadrant Score: 954
Screen Time out: 2 mins
Brightness: Low
Wifi: auto
Battery Life: 12hrs

With SetCPU settings changed to recommendations in Battery Life thread Quadrant Score change is negligible battery life is improved.

Using Clockwork Mod to Overclock:

950MHz
Software: Android 2.1
B&N: 1.0.1
CPU: 300MHz, 600MHz, 950MHz
Quadrant Score: 1093 (14.5% higher than stock)
Screen Time out: 2 mins
Brightness: Low
Wifi: auto
Battery Life: Not tested
SetCPU: rico2001's settings


1000MHz
Would not boot.


1000MHz - omap 3630
Software: Android 2.1
B&N: 1.0.1
CPU: 300MHz, 600MHz, 800MHz, 1000MHz
Quadrant Score: 1124 (17.8% higher than stock)
Screen Time out: 2 mins
Brightness: Low
Wifi: auto
Battery Life: Not tested
SetCPU: rico2001 default settings


1100MHz - omap 3630
Software: Android 2.1
B&N: 1.0.1
CPU: 300MHz, 600MHz, , 800MHZ, 1000MHz, 1100MHz
Quadrant Score: 1170 (22.6% higher than stock)
Screen Time out: 2 mins
Brightness: Low
Wifi: auto
Battery Life: Not tested
SetCPU: rico2001 default settings, also tested with alternative SetCPU Conservative profile settings (http://www.androidtablets.net/forum...19-setcpu-settings-nookcolor-3.html#post52675) with no real change in score.

 

Search the Market for Quadrant, free app.

this post brought to you by AndroidTablets.net app

 

800MHz - Phiremod Beta 2
Software: Android 2.2
B&N: N/A
CPU: 300MHz, 600MHz, 800MHz
Quadrant Score: 1476 (55.7% higher than stock)
Screen Time out: 2 mins
Brightness: Low
Wifi: auto
Battery Life: Not tested
SetCPU: SetCPU Conservative profile settings (SetCPU settings for the NOOKcolor)

1000MHz - Phiremod Beta 2
Software: Android 2.2
B&N: N/A
CPU: 300MHz, 600MHz, 800MHz, 1000MHz
Quadrant Score: 1762 (84.7% higher than stock)
Smartbench 2011: 756/959
Linpack: Not tested
Screen Time out: 2 mins
Brightness: Low
Wifi: auto
Battery Life: Not tested
SetCPU: SetCPU Conservative profile settings (SetCPU settings for the NOOKcolor)

1100MHz - Phiremod Beta 2
Software: Android 2.2
B&N: N/A
CPU: 300MHz, 600MHz, 800MHz, 1100MHz
Quadrant Score: 1860 (94.97% higher than stock). Very inconsistent results with this kernel.
Smartbench 2011: 817/995
Linpack: 13.388 MFlops, 6.26 sec, 5.68 NRes
Screen Time out: 2 mins
Brightness: Low
Wifi: auto
Battery Life: Not tested
SetCPU: SetCPU Conservative profile settings (SetCPU settings for the NOOKcolor)

 

YES, as of now you cant run Quadrant on Phiremod / CM builds.

 

Nice, so Phiremod Beta 2 at 1.1GHz takes it up to 85.02% increase over the stock score of 948. It is another 30% higher than Beta 2 at 800MHz over stock!

 

There are many good options right now but none are perfect. Sort of the wild wild west at the moment. For my reported scores I usually try and take an average of 3 or 4 tests since there always seems to be one much higher and one much lower than the others over a few tests. Looks like I need to get the 1.1GHz kernel for my Beta 2.

 

I just got about the same result with the 1000MHz kernel. Not too shabby.