VTab1008 Benchmarks

J515OP

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jan 6, 2011
5,172
899
Since there are basically 3 different versions of Vtab software available I thought it would be interesting to compile a performance list and see if there are any differnces among the Vizio builds. The device information can be found under settings. Please feel free to try one or more benchmarks and list your results in a similar format to make comparison easy.

Android Version: 2.3.2
Kernel: 2.6.35.7
Software: V.I.A. Plus 1.4

Quadrant-
Total:954
CPU: 1424
Mem: 1698
I/O: 420
2d: 221
3D: 969 @ ~28FPS

Linpack-
Single Thread
MFLOPS: 17.716
Time: 4.73 Seconds
Norm Res: 5.68
Multi-Thread
MFLOPS: 11.722
Time: 14.39 Seconds
Norm Res: 3.24

AnTutu-
Crashes

NenaMark2-(Good for testing graphics)
Score: 17.2fps

Vellamo-(Good for testing browser experience)
Score: 421

By comparison my Nook Color running CM9 and OC to 1.1GHZ scores ~1700 in Quadrant with 3D at ~29FPS and 649 in Vellamo (running in about 1/3 the time). A Galaxy Tab scores about 2275 in Quadrant and a Transformer Prime on ICS scores ~1400 in Vellamo.

(The benchmarks can be found in the Play store.)
 
Last edited:

Kemper

Member
Mar 15, 2012
155
6
OK on the GB tablet, Q score 888, 3-D 860? I/O 368 cpu 1396 Mem 1595. Have not done HC tab yet, will do in AM Hope that helps. I assume your is an HC tab. so it looks like the HC is faster, but my 3-D was cool as hell, I did not know it would do that. That score doesn't come close to yours, but i read it twice.

Want me to do it on my Fire? Can I download Q to the fire?

OK second test on same GB tab. Q 937 CPU 1438 I/O 474 2D 224 3D 789 They sure look different than first pass. I did not get a 2D score on first pass.

forgot mem 1758

Tab Version Andriod 2.32 GRH 78C Kernel 2.6.35.7+ Hardware ver 5(PVT1)

software via plus 1.4 looks like we have same tab? build number 1.9.57
 
Last edited by a moderator:

lesterF

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2012
14
0
Android Version: 3.2.1 HTK55
Kernel: 2.6.35.7+
Software: V.I.A. Plus 2.0

Quadrant:
Total: 881
CPU: 1266
Mem: 1391
I/O: 508
2d: 245
3d: 996
 

Kemper

Member
Mar 15, 2012
155
6
Android Version: 3.2.1 HTK55
Kernel: 2.6.35.7+
Software: V.I.A. Plus 2.0

Quadrant:
Total: 881
CPU: 1266
Mem: 1391
I/O: 508
2d: 245
3d: 996

3.21 Is that HC Android version? Since mine is the GB? I thought the VIA 2.0 was the HC install.
 

lesterF

Senior Member
Mar 9, 2012
14
0
Yes, 3.2.1 is Honeycomb.
Strange...I just ran the Quadrant test again, and got different results:

Android Version: 3.2.1 HTK55 (honeycomb)
Kernel: 2.6.35.7+
Software: V.I.A. Plus 2.0

Quadrant:
Total: 1067
CPU: 1440
Mem: 1744
I/O: 868
2d: 278
3d: 1003
 

J515OP

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jan 6, 2011
5,172
899
Yes, the benchmarks aren't totally consistent but can give you an idea. I generally run mine a few times (not necessarily in a row) and make note of the average results. I would say the 1067 score is higher than any I have ever achieved in GB though.
 

Kemper

Member
Mar 15, 2012
155
6
I can not get the Q to run on my HC tablet? So WTF? It loads and then just sits there.
 

J515OP

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jan 6, 2011
5,172
899
Updated OP with NenaMark2 score. 17.2 frames per second. Not bad and definitely a watchable frame rate. Top devices can score upwards of 40fps though.
 
Last edited:

Roger2008

Member
Apr 4, 2012
152
6
Updated OP with NenaMark2 score. 17.2 frames per second. Not bad and definitely a watchable frame rate. Top devices can score upwards of 40fps though.

Are you running your test with the WiFi off?

And I see what I can get after an upcoming Factory Reset of my HC VTAB.
 

J515OP

Super Moderator
Staff member
Jan 6, 2011
5,172
899
I am running all tests with wifi on and in "regular use mode." No fresh reboots or app killing or anything to game a better score. Just pick it up and run the tests to get real world results :)
 
Top